My land is blighted by a future acquisition
When land is earmarked for a future public purpose, the project may be years away but the effect on the owner is immediate: buyers hesitate, value stalls and plans freeze. New South Wales law recognises this. In defined circumstances an owner can require the authority to acquire the land ahead of schedule rather than wait to be acquired on the authority's timetable.
- Jurisdiction
- New South Wales
- Page type
- Situation guide
On this page
This page may be relevant if:
- Your land is designated or reserved for a future public purpose
- You have tried to sell and buyers withdraw once the project is disclosed
- Health or financial circumstances mean you need to sell now
- The acquiring authority says it is not ready to buy
What this usually means
- Where land is designated for acquisition for a future public purpose, the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 allows an eligible owner to require the authority to acquire it early, if the authority is of the opinion that the owner will suffer hardship if acquisition is delayed. Some owners, such as public companies and their subsidiaries, cannot use this pathway.
- Hardship has two parts. First, the owner is unable to sell the land, or unable to sell it at its market value, because of the designation. Second, it has become necessary for the owner to sell all or part of the land without delay, either for pressing personal, domestic or social reasons or to avoid the loss of, or a substantial reduction in, the owner's income. Where the owner is a company, those reasons must relate to an individual who holds at least 20 per cent of its shares.
- Land counts as designated for this purpose if an environmental planning instrument, such as a local environmental plan, reserves it exclusively for a public purpose (for example, public open space or a road) and names the authority that is to acquire it, or if an authority has given written notice, in connection with a development application for the land, that it will acquire the land in future. Owners of reserved land therefore use the same hardship provisions of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991. The planning legislation does not create a separate procedure: it requires the instrument to name the acquiring authority and provides that an instrument cannot otherwise require an authority to acquire land.
- Compensation is assessed under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 and includes the market value of the land, assessed without the effect of the proposal. For a hardship acquisition, however, section 26 provides that special value, loss attributable to severance or disturbance, and disadvantage resulting from relocation need not be taken into account. The NSW Court of Appeal has held that this is a discretion, not an automatic exclusion, and NSW Government requirements direct acquiring authorities to consider each of those heads and to give written reasons if one is not paid. Legal costs of establishing hardship, incurred before the authority accepts the application, have been held not to be recoverable as disturbance.
What commonly matters
-
Establishing the designation
The pathway depends on how the land is identified for future acquisition, so the instrument or designation needs to be pinned down first.
-
Evidencing hardship
Marketing history, valuation evidence and personal circumstances together make the case; assembling them properly is most of the work.
-
Dealing with refusal
All owners must sign the notice, although only one needs to be suffering hardship. Once the notice is given, the authority must acquire the land within 90 days unless a longer period is agreed in writing; before then it may instead lift the designation (for reserved land, by undertaking in writing to use its best endeavours to remove the reservation). If the authority decides not to acquire, the Act allows the owner 28 days after being notified of the decision to apply for an independent review, and if the land has not been acquired within 90 days the authority is treated as having refused for that purpose (NSW Government guidance treats the 28 days as running from then). The reviewer's decision is final, although a court challenge may remain available on limited legal grounds, so dates should be diarised from the outset.
-
Compensation discipline
A hardship acquisition proceeds by compulsory process unless a purchase is agreed, but special value, severance, disturbance and relocation disadvantage can be left out of account, so each needs to be claimed and justified rather than assumed, and the cost of preparing the hardship application itself should be budgeted as unrecoverable.
How we help
- Advise on whether the owner-initiated pathway is available
- Prepare the hardship application and supporting evidence
- Deal with the authority and contest an unjustified refusal
- Run the compensation claim once acquisition proceeds
Related reading
- Compulsory acquisition Early acquisition due to hardship in NSW When an owner of NSW land designated for acquisition may require early acquisition for hardship, when the 90-day period runs and what the evidence must show.
- Compulsory acquisition Acquisition by agreement under the Just Terms Act When the NSW Just Terms Act applies to an agreed acquisition and what the contract or deed should address before signature.
- Compulsory acquisition Disadvantage resulting from relocation in NSW acquisitions When compensation for disadvantage resulting from relocation is payable in a NSW acquisition, how the indexed maximum works and which evidence supports a claim.
This page is general information only and is not legal advice. It may not be current, and how the law applies depends on the specific facts. For advice on your situation, contact Stone & Pillar Legal.
Frequently asked questions
General information only, not legal advice. The position depends on your circumstances.
What counts as hardship for owner-initiated acquisition in NSW?
The Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) sets a two-part test, and the authority must be of the opinion that both parts are met. First, because of the designation, the owner is unable to sell the land, or unable to sell it at its market value. Second, it has become necessary for the owner to sell all or part of the land without delay, either for pressing personal, domestic or social reasons or to avoid the loss of, or a substantial reduction in, the owner's income. For a company owner, the reasons must relate to an individual who holds at least 20 per cent of its shares. Marketing history, or a real estate agent's written opinion where a sales campaign would be futile, valuation evidence and documented personal circumstances usually carry the application.
My land is reserved under a planning instrument. Is that the same pathway?
Yes, if the reservation meets the Act's test. Under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), land is 'designated for acquisition for a public purpose' if an environmental planning instrument reserves it exclusively for a public purpose, such as open space or a road, and names the authority that is to acquire it. Land set apart for a public purpose and also for other purposes that are not a reasonable use of the land is treated the same way, and if no authority has been named, the Minister administering the planning legislation determines which authority is to acquire it. The owner then uses the hardship provisions of that Act; the planning legislation does not create a separate pathway, but requires the instrument to name the acquiring authority. Not every zoning or map notation qualifies, so the instrument, any Land Reservation Acquisition Map and any notice from the authority need to be read closely first.
Is compensation lower if I initiate the acquisition myself?
It can be. Compensation for a hardship acquisition is assessed under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) and includes the market value of the land, assessed without the effect of the proposal. But section 26 of that Act provides that special value, loss attributable to severance or disturbance, and disadvantage resulting from relocation need not be taken into account. The NSW Court of Appeal has held that this is a discretion rather than an automatic exclusion, and NSW Government requirements say acquiring authorities must consider each of those heads, should pay them unless there is a good reason not to, and must explain in writing why any is not paid. Separately, the Court of Appeal has held that legal costs incurred in establishing hardship, before the authority accepts the application, are not recoverable as disturbance; later legal costs of the acquisition can be claimed in the usual way, subject to that discretion. Because the owner is choosing to bring the acquisition forward, these differences belong in the decision whether to apply, and the heads claimed need to be identified and evidenced.
Related situations
- Compulsory acquisition My land is being acquired Clear advice on proposed acquisition notices, compensation claims, valuation issues and disturbance losses.
- Compulsory acquisition I received a Proposed Acquisition Notice A Proposed Acquisition Notice starts a defined pre-acquisition timetable. Understand what it means, the compensation claim period and the first steps that protect your position.
- Compulsory acquisition I am affected by a development or infrastructure project Understand your rights, objection options, compensation issues, access impacts and review pathways.
Where to start
Unable to sell land earmarked for a future public purpose?
A preliminary review can identify the decision, the material available, any stated date and the questions requiring legal or expert assessment.
No charge · Not legal advice
A preliminary call is a short conversation to check whether we can help, at no charge, and not legal advice. Please don't send confidential or time-sensitive material until we confirm in writing that we can act.