Skip to content
Planning & development

My DA was refused

When a council refuses a development application, the determination is rarely the end of the road. In New South Wales, there is usually a right to seek merits review of the decision in the Land and Environment Court, and often opportunities to negotiate, amend or strengthen the proposal before or during that process.

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Page type
Situation guide
Timing
Time-sensitive
On this page

This page may be relevant if:

  • You have received a notice of determination refusing your DA
  • Your DA was approved but with conditions you cannot accept
  • You are weighing whether to appeal, amend and resubmit, or negotiate
  • You are unsure how long you have to act

What this usually means

  • A refusal sets out the reasons the consent authority was not satisfied; those reasons then frame any appeal or amended proposal.
  • Most DA refusals can be challenged by way of a merits appeal (commonly a Class 1 appeal) in the Land and Environment Court, where the Court re-decides the application.
  • Appeal rights are time-limited. For an applicant appeal against an actual determination, the period is six months after the determination is notified or registered on the NSW Planning Portal. Since 21 March 2026 an appeal cannot be lodged while a review of the determination under Division 8.2 is under way, and the time the review takes does not count towards the six months. Confirming the exact dates early still matters, because the right lapses if the period runs out.
  • Amended plans, further information and expert evidence can often address the reasons for refusal.

What commonly matters

  1. The reasons for refusal

    Each ground of refusal needs to be tested. Some are answerable with evidence or amendments; others go to fundamental planning merit.

  2. Time limits

    Appeal periods are strict. Identifying the deadline early preserves your options and avoids a procedural dead end.

  3. Evidence and experts

    Planning, urban design, heritage, traffic, acoustic or environmental evidence is often decisive. The right experts depend on the grounds of refusal.

  4. Negotiation and amendment

    Conciliation and amended plans frequently resolve appeals without a contested hearing, but the strategy needs to be set early.

How we help

  • Review the refusal and assess the prospects of a successful appeal
  • Identify time limits and the correct review pathway
  • Advise on amended plans, further information and the expert evidence required
  • Represent you in conciliation, negotiation and Land and Environment Court proceedings

This page is general information only and is not legal advice. It may not be current, and how the law applies depends on the specific facts. For advice on your situation, contact Stone & Pillar Legal.

Frequently asked questions

General information only, not legal advice. The position depends on your circumstances.

Can I ask the council to review its decision instead of appealing to the Court?

In many cases the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) allows an applicant to ask the consent authority to review its own determination (commonly called a section 8.2 review), which can be quicker and less formal than a Land and Environment Court appeal. A review is not available for every application, and some applications are not eligible for a review at all. Where the determination was made by a local planning panel or a Sydney district or regional planning panel, a review is generally conducted by that panel rather than by council staff. Since 21 March 2026, an applicant whose application was determined by council staff can ask for the review to be conducted by the council's local planning panel, if it has one. Since that date an applicant generally has six months to request a review, and there is no fixed period within which the review must be decided. Requesting a review affects the appeal right: an appeal cannot be commenced while the review is underway, and the six-month appeal period is paused until the review ends. Because eligibility and timing depend on the type of determination and when it was made, the position should be checked before any date passes.

What is a section 34 conciliation conference in the Land and Environment Court?

A section 34 conciliation conference is a structured, without-prejudice meeting under the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) in which the parties, with a Commissioner, try to reach agreement on a Class 1 appeal, often after amended plans or further information have been provided. If agreement is reached the Commissioner can dispose of the appeal by granting consent, and if it is not, the matter generally proceeds to a hearing. Many DA refusal appeals are resolved at this stage, but whether agreement is possible depends on the grounds of refusal and the evidence.

How much does it cost to appeal a refused DA in NSW?

The cost of a Class 1 merits appeal in the Land and Environment Court varies widely and usually includes a Court filing fee, your lawyers' fees and the cost of expert evidence such as planning, urban design, heritage or traffic reports. The scale and number of experts, whether the appeal settles at a section 34 conciliation conference or runs to a contested hearing, and the complexity of the grounds of refusal all affect the overall cost. In Class 1 proceedings each party generally bears its own costs, though there are exceptions, so the likely cost is usually best understood through an estimate tailored to the particular matter.

Is it better to lodge a new DA or appeal the refusal?

Both options can be available after a refusal, and which is more appropriate depends on the grounds of refusal, the scope of changes needed and the relevant time limits. Lodging a fresh or amended development application may suit cases where the proposal can be substantially redesigned, while a Land and Environment Court appeal (often involving amended plans and conciliation) may suit cases where the planning merit is sound but the council was not satisfied. The applicant appeal period is six months after the determination is notified or registered on the NSW Planning Portal. Since 21 March 2026 an appeal cannot be lodged while a Division 8.2 review is under way, and the time the review takes does not count towards the six months, so a review can be sought without giving up the appeal option; the practical effect of each pathway on timing still depends on the facts and should be confirmed early.

Where to start

Facing a DA refusal, conditions or a planning dispute?

A preliminary review can identify the decision, the material available, any stated date and the questions requiring legal or expert assessment.

Start the Matter Navigator

Book a preliminary call

No charge · Not legal advice

A preliminary call is a short conversation to check whether we can help, at no charge, and not legal advice. Please don't send confidential or time-sensitive material until we confirm in writing that we can act.

Book a preliminary call Call